6.0 A Choice of Futures:

One can consider from clearly presented alternatives a choice of marine futures on many issues regarding marine policy decisions.

Integrated management of marine systems—that is, coordinated management of all alternative uses of the ocean is probably the only way we are going to have any chance of securing a sustainable fishery. Here the decisions are political. Bring the issues up at all levels of government and if necessary get involved to help make changes. See 3.2 Integration
From Marine Fisheries Systems
http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.287.aspx.pdf
Although the emphasis in recent years has been on unsustainable fishing practices, fisheries represent only one of many human
influences on marine ecosystems. In coastal marine systems in par- ticular, coastal development—with concomitant problems of local pollution and habitat destruction—is very important. (See Chapter 19.) Non-fisheries human influences such as marine debris and oil slicks are also important on the high seas. As a result, as de- scribed earlier, several nations are attempting to develop legislation and policies to facilitate integrated management of marine systems—that is, coordinated management of all alternative uses of the ocean. Such uses include harvesting marine species for food and other purposes, aquaculture, research, oil and gas exploration, ocean mining, dredging, ocean dumping, energy generation, eco-tourism, marine transportation, and defense. To date, it has proved difficult to integrate the management of all these activities because the authorities regulating these activities are usually inde- pendent of one another (Sissenwine and Mace 2003).
We need to be involved in the choice of options for human sewage and industrial effluent disposal in coastal waters.
We must deal with agricultural runoff head on. People have to make a choice.
The implications for uncontrolled population growth of our communities, making the marine systems unsustainable is an issue of importance needing political decisions.
The pros and cons of sustainable and non-sustainable aquaculture practises should be another area where the public is asked to make a commitment.
The regulation of harvesting and the decision to create reserves and marine protected areas are other aspects that when people are presented with the facts, they should be asked to commit to one alternative or the other.
Our goal should be to make an educated and aware public who can participate in solving the problems of humans living sustainably in the marine area.
The Climate change choice of futures. Implications are mentioned in this reference and the urgency to act now is encouraged

6.1 Threshholds in Systems.

Return to Index

5.10 The First Nations Role

In the document the Earth Charter, http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/2000/10/the_earth_charter.html a clear recognition of the importance of the knowledge of First Nations peoples is stated.

PRINCIPLE 22 of the Rio Declaration: Indigenous people and their communities, and other local communities, have a vital role in environmental management and development because of their knowledge and traditional practices. States should recognize and fully support their identity, culture and interests and enable their effective participation in the achievement of sustainable development.

A reference which may prove useful is from “Breaking Ice” on Adaptive Co-management of Arctic Char in Nunavut territory.

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IKt–FmDOMAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA249&dq=Berkes,+F.,+J.+Colding,+and+C.+Folke.+2000.+Rediscovery+of+Traditional+Ecological+Knowledge+as+Adaptive+Management.+Ecological+Applications+10,+no.+5:+1251-62.&ots=BgvyKR2N2w&sig=fhxYaFHSRij2mEADUYU9UO4z4fc

It demonstrate an example of a successful sustainable fishery model based on integration with First Nations traditional knowledge..

6.0 A Choice of Futures

Return to Index

5.9 Historical Connections

Any study about Ecological Sustainability should acknowledge the positive and negative contributions to this goal by human actions and inaction in the near past of British Columbia. Acts of individuals or governments through the years could be targeted which have had significant effects in contribution in this area.It is probably easier to find examples showing the opposite, but we must attempt to point out the positive and try to encourage more.

  • First Nations, an  integral part of the ecosystem. Cultural practices which ensured sustainability of marine resources must be emphasized.

Problems issues:

  • early fisheries using “endless” bountiful resources
  • logging impacting on watersheds and therefore sediment transport to ocean ecosystems
  • transportation corridors for lumber, mining, trade; certainly part of the ecosystem services of the area but also part of what has led to problems.
  • explorers, their contributions and the problems they brought for marine sustainability..
  • Marine mammal harvest: Whales, fur seal and sea otter population decimation and consequent ecosystem impacts.
  • Military.. Is the present use of military test ranges a sustainable use of the marine environment.
  • Subsea sonar problems
  • Humans discharging sewage into the ocean
  • etc

5.10 The First Nations Role

Return to Index

5.8 The Ecological Footprint

The concept of our Ecological Footprint when considering the ocean resources, is the literal footprint of bottom trawling and other destructive practices in marine harvest. The same with unsustainable examples of aquaculture leading us to realize there are implications for ecological footprint in our choice of marine food menues.

The work of Dr.Bill Reese could be profiled here.

See the reference from http://www.unep.org/geo/geo4/report/06_Regional_Perspectives.pdf
WATER:
http://www.unep.org/geo/geo4/report/04_Water.pdf

5.9 Historical connections

Return to Index

5.6 Aquaculture for a Sustainable Food Supply

Not all aquaculture is bad, and it is certainly necessary if we are to provide for the demand for seafood products. In the literature referenced, the principles of sustainability are emphasized. Reference 9 below gives the statistics of aquaculture products in BC. Polyculture methods used in some third world countries should also be considered as it helps to tie in with the global perspective.. It also helps to fulfill  mandates of the earth charter.

References for resources:

1.Indicators for the Sustainability of Aquaculture. D Pauly

http://www.fisheries.ubc.ca/members/dpauly/chaptersInBooksReports/2007/IndicatorsForTheSustainabilityOfAquaCulture.pdf

2. Sustainable Organic Aquaculture: http://www.aquanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=259&Itemid=44

3. Duckweed Farming: http://www.p2pays.org/ref/09/08875.htm#Section%202%20-%20Duckweed%20farming

4. Sustainable Marine Aquaculture, Jan 2007.

http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Protecting_ocean_life/Sustainable_Marine_Aquaculture_final_1_07.pdf

5. DFO video on Sustainable Aquaculture…. Bamfield example.

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Aquaculture/aquaculture_e.htm

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Aquaculture/multimedia/video /gain_net_e.wmv

6. DFO- Pacific

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/aquaculture/pacific_e.htm

7. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/aquaculture/innovation_e.htm#2

8. BC -Report of the Special Committee on Sustainable Aquaculture.

http://www.leg.bc.ca/cmt/38thparl/session-3/aquaculture/index.htm

9. Aquaculture Statistics in BC

http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/omfd/fishstats/aqua/index.html

10. Replacement of Fish Meal with Replacement of Fish Meal with Plant Proteins in Diets for Plant Proteins in Diets for Summer Flounder http://www.hboi.edu/aqua/downloads/pdf/conf07/bengston.pdf

abstract: http://www.hboi.edu/aqua/downloads/pdf/conf07/abstract_bengston.pdf

5.7 The Need for Protected Areas

Return to Index

 

5.5 Ocean Food- What’s in your diet?

Below are presented references which area good background to the concept of how we must harvest and eat from the ocean in a sustainable way and make an effort to promote the consumption of locally sustainably harvested seafood. See the Take Away section for ideas on that.

From: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5352 Oceans in Peril: Protecting Marine Biodiversity publ 2007 “Life almost certainly originated in the oceans, yet the biological diversity of marine habitats is threatened by the activities of one largely land-based species: us. The activities through which humans threaten marine life include overfishing, use of destructive fishing methods, pollution, and commercial aquaculture. In addition, climate change and the related acidification of the oceans is already having an impact on some marine ecosystems. Essential to solving these problems will be more equitable and sustainable management of the oceans as well as stronger protection of marine ecosystems through a well-enforced network of marine reserves. Presently, 76 percent of the world’s fish stocks are fully exploited or overexploited, and many species have been severely depleted, largely due to our growing appetite for seafood. Current fisheries management regimes contribute to the widespread market-driven degradation of the oceans by failing to implement and enforce adequate protective measures. Many policymakers and scientists now agree that we must adopt a radical new approach to managing the seasons that is precautionary in nature and has the protection of the whole marine ecosystem as its primary objective. This “ecosystem approach” is vital if we are to ensure the health of our oceans for future generations.
An ecosystem approach promotes both conservation and the sustainable use of marine resources in an equitable way. It is a holistic approach that considers environmental protection and marine management together, rather than as two separate and mutually exclusive goals. Paramount to the application of this approach is the establishment of networks of fully protected marine reserves, in essence, “national parks” of the sea. These provide protection of whole ecosystems and enable biodiversity to both recover and flourish. They also benefit fisheries by allowing for spillover of fish and larvae or eggs from the reserve into adjacent fishing grounds.
Outside of the reserves, an ecosystem approach requires the sustainable management of fisheries and other resources. Demands on marine resources must be managed within the limits of what the ecosystem can provide indefinitely, rather than being allowed to expand as demographic and market forces dictate. An ecosystem approach requires protection at the level of the whole ecosystem. This is radically different from the current practice, where most fisheries management measures focus simply on single species and do not consider the role of these species in the wider ecosystem.
An ecosystem approach is also precautionary in nature, meaning that a lack of knowledge should not excuse decision-makers from taking action, but rather lead them to err on the side of caution. The burden of proof must be placed on those who want to undertake activities, such as fishing or coastal development, to show that these activities will not harm the marine environment. In other words, current presumptions that favor freedom to fish and freedom of the seas will need to be replaced with the new concept of freedom for the seas.”

Oceans in Peril Quiz: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5358

CATCH OF THE DAY: CHOOSING SEAFOOD FOR HEALTHIER OCEANS World Watch A t a time when international treaties, restrictive quotas, and global regulation of fleets have proven ineffective in pro- tecting beleaguered fish populations, a surprising ally is emerging to tackle the growing fisheries crisis. Buyers of seafood ;including individual consumers, school cafeterias, supermarket chains, and large food processors ;are choosing to avoid threatened or problematic species in favor of fish that are caught or raised with less impact on the world s oceans. While some seafood lovers are concerned about guaranteeing the future availability of popular fish, others wish to preserve the quality of today s seafood by knowing more about how and where it is caught. As more of our daily food options originate in factories, fish remains the last wild food we consume in large quantities and one of our few remaining direct connections to the natural world. Yet even as seafood becomes scarcer, we are eating more of it. Chinese consumers now eat roughly five times as much seafood per capita as they did in 1961, and total fish consumption in China has increased more than tenfold. Over the same period, U.S. seafood consumption jumped 2.5 times. For people living in wealthy nations, seafood is an increasingly popular health food option. With its high levels of fatty acids and trace minerals, nutritionists recognize it as essential to the development and maintenance of good neurological func- tion, not to mention reduced risk of cancer, heart disease, and other debilitating conditions. In poorer nations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, people are also eating more fish, if they can afford it. For more than one billion people, mostly in Asia, fish supplies 30 percent of their protein, versus just 6 percent worldwide. From high-profile celebrity campaigns, to shocking footage of shark finning, to the debut of wallet-sized seafood buying guides, everyday consumers are learning more about the consequences of their seafood purchases. The London-based Marine Stewardship Council, the largest global organization that certifies certain seafood as sustainable, has granted its label to 18 fisheries worldwide, including North Sea herring, Australian mackerel, and Baja California red rock lobster, and morethan 370 products in nearly 30 nations now carry the group’s Fish Forever logo. Meanwhile, certain seafood com- panies are beginning to base their business on the story behind the fish ;how it s raised, caught, and processed ; just as many supermarkets and agribusinesses now capitalize on rising interest in organic produce, grass-fed beef, and other environmentally friendly food alternatives. Even large chains like Unilever, Wal-Mart, and Red Lobster have made commit- ments to source their seafood only from intact fish populations or to celebrate the small-scale fishers whose techniques are gen- erally less destructive than industrial fleets. But this growing movement remains fragile, as the com- mitments of many participants remain incomplete or lack staying power. For instance, Wal-Mart s recent pledge to sell only certified sustainable fish in the next 5 years involves no commitments with respect to farmed salmon and Asian- farmed shrimp, which constitute the bulk of its seafood sales. And endangered swordfish, Atlantic cod, and Chilean sea bass are making a comeback on restaurant menus as chefs for- get past campaigns to protect them. Such consumer-oriented campaigns to save marine life aren t new. Previous efforts have been organized in the name of saving whales, seals, dolphins, or other marine species from extinction. Yet most of the fish we eat didn t seem to war- rant the same sort of protection ;a throwback to the long- standing view that the oceans are inexhaustible. Today, most of the world s seafood, from tuna to salmon to bay scallops, is threatened with extinction. For less-threatened species, like shrimp or farmed salmon, survival isn t so much the issue as how the fish is raised or caught, which can have adverse impacts on the environment or human health. In both cases, seafood eaters are increasingly invited to play a role in turning the situation around. Some seafood enthusiasts are going beyond simply investigating the origins of their fish to helping in shoreline cleanups, reforesting coastal areas, and raising shellfish to seed wild beds. A public that better understands the state of the world s oceans can be a driving force in helping governments pass legislation to ban destructive fishing, mandate seafood labels that indicate how fish were caught, and create marine preserves where fish can spawn off-limits to fishing. Being a more deliberate seafood eater doesn’t mean a spartan existence; in fact, it could be the only guarantee that fresh and healthy fish continues to appear on our tables.

5.6 Aquaculture as a sustainable Food Supply

Return to Index

4.1 Sensors and the Collection of Physical Data

I have listed here a number of ways to monitor physical factors of ecosystems at various levels and locations. [blockquote]

  • Local monitors of all exhibit tanks to show different parameters.
    • oxygen levels of aerated vs bottom muds
    • ph change as photosynthesis changes in a green pool
    • set up a green tank highly enriched with nutrients for this
    • have a “convertible tank” where automatic changes can be introduced which then can register abiotic changes on the instruments. This provides great opportunities for schools to do research. For instance a tank may have a screen barrier separating two populations of fish or invertebrates. Oxygen, Co2 pH and other sensors monitors the whole tank. At periodic intervals, a gate is lowered seperating the water bodies of the two tanks, on the monitors, digital or graphics show a timeline and the change in physical factors contrasting the opposing sides.
    • demo of currents feeding barnacles.. ie dependence on that factors
  • Remote site monitors.
    • interactive modelling with temperature data from Race Rocks.. and implications for global change.
    • atmospheric and oceanographic sensors monitoring at Race Rocks.
    • Links and interpretations to physical measurements in real time from the Venus sub-sea research program.
    • Links and interpretations to physical measurements in real time from the Neptune sub-sea research program.
    • Links to the Victoria weather network... school contribution a part of this.[blockquote]

     

  • Index
  • 4.2 The importance of pH. ( ocean Acidification)

3.2 Integration and Interconnectivity of Marine Ecosystems.

The three themes to be emphasized here overlap into many other aspects of this report as well. We are talking about Ecosystems that by definition are interrelated. I think it is important to point them out as themes however since they may get overlooked otherwise.

1. Marine ecosystems and the organisms living within them are highly interconnected and interdependant.

2. The ecosystems people  live in and the activities they do in everyday life have a close connection with the welfare of marine ecosystems and their organisms.

3. We manage the resources and activities of different ecosystems in isolated jurisdictions of our governments and if change is to be effected, there are implications here.

—————————————————————————————-

1. A problem with defining the model of any marine system is that we have to draw boundaries which immediately restrict the reality of that system. We have a tendency to want to compartmentalize in order to make sense of things but nature doesn’t really work that way. This point should be made clear when modelling any ecosystem in an exhibit, and at every opportunity, the interactions with other ecosystems should be acknowledged.

  • The anadromous fish story is probably the classic one to show interactions . Not only marine and fresh water systems, but the interconnections with surrounding forests as well.
  • Marine mammals which may haul out on our rocky island ecosystems or swim in our local waters, but may within their lifetime traverse thousands of miles of coastal and open oceans.
  • Plankton distribution and migrations across ecosystems, the foam wind swept onto a beach carrying bits of ocean planktonic debris which is gleaned by a migrating shorebird, probably originated in the open ocean or as larvae in distant rocky intertidal zones.

2. A very constructive public education role can be served by any educational curriculum  in providing viewers with the evidence that the ecosystems in which they live and the activities they do in everyday life have a close connection with the welfare of marine ecosystems and their organisms. Just a few of the areas which can be included are as follows

  • coastal cities and the materials they shed into the water.
  • Agriculture runoff and the influence on eutrophication in marine systems.
  • Introduction of exotic species which compromises the ecological integrity of natural ecosystems
  • marine transportation and its effect
  • marine recreation and its effect on organisms and ecosystems.
  • Marine harvesting activities
  • The activities we do that affect climate change.

The point to make in all of this is that all these activities can have a range of impact from severe to non-significant in terms of how ecosystems are effected. Here again the proposal must be made that this is part of our choice of futures for the ocean.

3. The implications for management of the resources in these overlapping ecosystems becomes clear when one can appreciate that we have allowed different levels of governments to deal with different ecosystems without considering their interactions. It points to the need for a holistic model of ecosystem management, rather than a compartmentalized one. This was one of the intents of the Oceans Act.. to break down that conflict in jurisdictions and have a new way of looking at and ensuring sustainability of the marine environment. The fact that agriculture, forestry, parks, military and fisheries are all managed separately with little appreciation of the ecosystems of their overlapping jurisdictions must be presented in all its absurdity for the public to perhaps start an open dialogue on how sustainability can be insured if we can’t get it right.

As part of biodiversity, the ways that organisms themselves have interdependencies provides a number of opportunities to illustrate interesting interrelationships.

 So how can this be portrayed?

  • Start by finding ( if there are any) some positive examples of ecosystem management which takes into account the interrelated aspects of ecosystems.
  • Present best-case scenarios for marine sustainability issues.
  • In the take-aways section, provide constructive acts for visitors to follow up on in order to try to affect change that recognizes the need for a new method of marine ecosystem management.

3.3 Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital

Return to Index

3.1.1 Key Species

Although all parts of an ecosystem are important for its long term sustainability, several species can be selected out which are essential to the operation of the whole system.

  • herring
    need for controls on over-harvesting

Ways these can be impacted:

  • overharvesting,
  • competition from introduced species
  • habitat loss.
  • toxic materials

How to mitigate this..

  • increase in research, baseline standards
  • moratorium on marine system development,
  • need to restore lost habitat
  • need for large areas to be set aside as parks or reserves for habitat now while it is available, later it may diminish.
  • complete detoxification of all run-off waters.
  • “a no negative impact” is the only option for marine developments.
  • recognition of interconnectivity in management of resources.

3.2 Integration and interconnections of Marine Ecosystems

Return to Index